By David Boyd
It is widely recognized that a minimum supply of potable water is a vital prerequisite for life, health, dignity, and the realization of other human rights.[i] Yet there are approximately one billion people who currently do not enjoy safe drinking water, thousands of children die every day from water-related illness, and climate change may exacerbate these problems.[ii] Many experts agree that legal recognition of the human right to water is a significant step towards increased access to safe drinking water.[iii] Therefore prominent organizations, individuals, and governments are campaigning vigorously for recognition of this right.[iv]
The right to water requires that all persons have affordable access to a supply of safe water in quantities adequate for essential personal and domestic uses, which include drinking, sanitation, washing of clothes, food preparation, and personal and household hygiene.[v] An adequate supply requires a minimum of 50 to 100 litres per person per day.[vi]
Recognition of the right to water requires governments to respect, protect, and fulfill the right. Respecting the right requires states to refrain from interfering directly or indirectly with the right. Protecting the right means ensuring that third parties do not interfere with or violate the right (e.g. through legislation preventing water pollution). Fulfilling the right requires positive state action—such as investment in water treatment and distribution infrastructure—to ensure that the right is universally enjoyed.[vii]
The benefits of recognizing that water is a legally protected human right include:
- stronger water laws, regulations, and policies;
- prioritizing resources for investment in water infrastructure, governance, and management;
- empowering citizens and communities to take part in decision-making processes related to water;
- providing a potential remedy for those whose right is being or may be violated;
- protecting water from pollution and other adverse impacts;
- preventing discrimination or neglect of under-privileged or marginalized communities; and
- providing a means of holding governments and corporations accountable.[viii]
It can be argued that the right to water need not be explicitly recognized because it is implicit in other rights such as the rights to life, health, a healthy environment, and an adequate standard of living.[ix] However, ensuring that the right to water receives sufficient attention and resources may require that it be given the prominence and visibility of an explicit and distinct right.[x]
There are many misconceptions regarding the right to water.[xi] It does not entitle everyone to an unlimited supply of water at all times, in any place, under any circumstances. It may be limited by the concept of progressive implementation, and such reasonable and just limits as are necessary in a free and democratic society. The right to water does not obligate nations to share their water resources with other nations, as state sovereignty is unimpaired. The fact that water is a human right does not mean that it should be free, any more than health care is free. Charging a price for water that reflects its full costs is justifiable on grounds of ecology, equity, and efficiency, subject to the imperative of providing a basic quantity of free or subsidized water for economically disadvantaged communities and individuals.
International Recognition of the Right to Water
Although mention of the right to water dates back to the Mar Del Plata Action Plan that emerged from the UN Conference on Water in 1977, there is not yet a global human rights treaty establishing this right in explicit and universal terms. Almost all nations have endorsed non-binding political declarations that mention the right to water, such as the Programme of Action of the 1994 Cairo Conference on Population and Development, endorsed by 177 States. Article 14(h) of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women provides for the right "to enjoy adequate living conditions, particularly in relation to … water supply." Article 24(2)(c) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child sets forth the child's right to “adequate nutritious foods and clean drinking-water.”
The right to water is not explicitly included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). However, implicit rights to water and sanitation are arguably included in s. 25 of the Universal Declaration (the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family) and ss. 11 and 12 (the rights to an adequate standard of living and health) of the ICESCR. The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights published General Comment No. 15 on the Right to Water in 2002, providing guidelines for the interpretation and implementation of the right.[xii] General Comment No. 15 identifies a suite of core obligations related to the right to water that are to be implemented immediately:
- To ensure access to the minimum essential amount of water that is sufficient and safe for personal and domestic uses to prevent disease;
- To ensure the right of access to water and water facilities and services on a non discriminatory basis, especially for disadvantaged or marginalized groups;
- To ensure physical access to water facilities or services that provide sufficient, safe and regular water; that have a sufficient number of water outlets to avoid prohibitive waiting times; and that are at a reasonable distance from the household;
- To ensure personal security is not threatened when having to physically access water;
- To ensure equitable distribution of all available water facilities and services;
- To adopt and implement a national water strategy and plan of action addressing the whole population;
- To monitor the extent of the realization, or the non-realization, of the right to water;
- To adopt relatively low-cost targeted water programmes to protect vulnerable and marginalized groups; and
- To take measures to prevent, treat, and control diseases linked to water, in particular ensuring access to adequate sanitation.
An earlier General Comment published by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights confirmed that governments have a core obligation to ensure the satisfaction of, at the very least, ‘minimum essential levels’ of each of the rights enunciated in the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.[xiii]
Momentum toward explicit and binding international recognition of the right to water has been building. In 2007, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights concluded “that it is now time to consider access to safe drinking water and sanitation as a human right [necessary] to sustain life and health.”[xiv] In 2010, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution recognizing the right to water, with 124 nations voting in favour, none against, and 41 nations abstaining. The resolution stated “the right to safe and clean drinking water is a human right that is essential for the full enjoyment of life and all human rights.”[xv] Canada was among the nations that abstained (see Appendix for details of Canada’s opposition to recognizing the right to water).[xvi] Later in 2010, the UN Human Rights Council issued a similar resolution, confirming that “the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation is derived from the right to an adequate standard of living and is inextricably related to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, as well as the right to life and human dignity.”[xvii]
The recent UN General Assembly resolution on the right to water has already had a demonstrable effect. In January 2011, the Botswana Court of Appeal relied on the resolution in ruling that the constitutional rights of the Bushmen of the Kalahari were being violated by the government’s refusal to allow them to access a water source within a wildlife reserve where they resided.[xviii]
National Recognition of the Right to Water
At the national level, the right to water is also gaining broader legal recognition.[xix] In 2007, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights observed that “an increasing number of States are recognizing safe drinking water as a human right in their constitutions, as well as national legislation, while national courts are enforcing it as a justiciable right.”[xx]
A. Constitutional Protection
Constitutional protection of the right to water can occur through explicit provisions or through recognition that the right is implicit in other human rights. Constitutional provisions explicitly requiring the protection and/or provision of clean water are found in at least 17 nations, and are increasingly prevalent in new constitutions.[xxi] For example, both the Dominican Republic and Kenya enacted new constitutions in 2010 that recognize the right to water.[xxii] In South Africa, the right to water is explicitly articulated in its 1996 Constitution and is enforceable through the courts:
27. Health care, food, water, and social security
(1) Everyone has the right to have access to—
(b) sufficient food and water …
(2) The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realization of each of these rights.[xxiii]
Explicit constitutional recognition of the right to water has had a significant effect on South African water laws and policies, and has contributed to major investments in infrastructure.[xxiv] In 2000, South Africa also passed legislation implementing the procedural rights entrenched in the Constitution (e.g. access to information), which are essential for the full enjoyment of substantive rights.[xxv] Recognition of the constitutional right to water is credited with spurring the extension of potable water to ten million South Africans (predominantly black and poor) in ten years.[xxvi] Nelson Mandela describes increased access to safe drinking water for millions of South Africans as “amongst the most important achievements of democracy in our country.”[xxvii] In Uruguay, the constitutional provision guaranteeing the right to clean water also prohibits privatization of the water supply. UN data show that 100% of Uruguayans enjoy access to improved sources of drinking water, consistent with their constitutional right.
In a number of nations where there is no explicit constitutional right to water—including Argentina[xxviii], Belgium[xxix], Brazil[xxx], Costa Rica[xxxi], Colombia[xxxii], India[xxxiii], Indonesia[xxxiv], Nepal[xxxv], and Pakistan[xxxvi]—courts have held that the right to water is an implicit but enforceable constitutional right. These courts based their decisions on the fact that access to safe drinking water is a fundamental prerequisite to the enjoyment of other human rights, including the right to life and the right to live in a healthy environment. For example, in Argentina, based on the constitutional right to a healthy environment, courts have ordered governments to provide communities with potable water, construct drinking water treatment facilities, provide medical treatment for individuals harmed by contaminated drinking water, and carry out environmental remediation of polluted watersheds.[xxxvii] An Argentine case involving Chacras de la Merced, a poor community whose drinking water was being contaminated by inadequate wastewater treatment in an upstream municipality, illustrates the potential for using the right to a healthy environment to advance the right to water.[xxxviii] An ENGO brought a lawsuit against the upstream municipality and the province on behalf of local residents asserting a violation of their constitutional right to a healthy environment. The Court agreed that there was a violation of the right and ordered the government to upgrade the wastewater treatment plant and, in the interim, provide a supply of clean water to the residents of Chacras de la Merced.[xxxix] The court-ordered infrastructure improvements were completed, and in an interesting development, the municipality passed a law mandating that all future sewage and sanitation tax revenues must be re-invested in upgrading and maintaining the sewage system. As observed in a recent Harvard Law Review article, “Although justiciability alone is not a panacea, it is a step in the direction of ensuring access to sufficient water.”[xl]
The right to life, which arguably includes an implicit right to water, is universally found in national constitutions.[xli] There are also 89 nations whose constitutions now explicitly recognize the right to live in a healthy environment.[xlii] The right to clean water is regarded as an integral element of this broader right. Empirical evidence demonstrates that there is a strong correlation between environmental provisions in constitutions and superior environmental performance.[xliii]
Constitutional recognition of the right to water does not create an absolute right to water. Courts will take into account the specific circumstances of a case and the challenges facing a government in determining whether the right is being violated.[xliv]
B. Legislative Recognition
Dozens of countries explicitly recognize the right to water in national legislation or policy, including Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Honduras, Indonesia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Mauritania, Namibia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Senegal, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Ukraine, and Venezuela.[xlv] For example, France enacted a new law in 2006 that explicitly recognizes the right to water:
Art. 1. Water is the common heritage of the nation. Its protection, enhancement and development, in accordance with the balance of nature, are of general interest.
In the framework of laws and regulations previously established, the use of water belongs to every physical person, for food and hygiene, and everyone has the right to access to drinking water under conditions economically acceptable to all.
The costs of water use, including environmental costs and the resources themselves, are borne by users, taking into account social, environmental, and economic consequences and geographical and climate conditions.[xlvi]
In nations where the rule of law is respected and there are adequate resources available, it can be expected that laws and policies recognizing the right to water will be implemented and enforced, resulting in greater access and less human suffering.
The right to water is not a silver bullet that will automatically address the world’s water crisis. However it is a powerful tool that can be used to focus attention and resources on improving access to water for those individuals and communities who currently endure the hardships imposed by the absence of safe water.
Dr. David R. Boyd is one of Canada’s leading environmental lawyers, an adjunct professor at Simon Fraser University, a former Trudeau Scholar, and author of nearly 100 publications including the books “The Environmental Rights Revolution: Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment” and “Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy.”
Appendix: Canada’s Position on the Right to Water
Canada’s Constitution does not explicitly acknowledge the right to water. There is no federal legislation explicitly recognizing the right to water.[xlvii] To date, no Canadian court has acknowledged the right.[xlviii] Most surprisingly, Canada opposes international recognition of the right to water.[xlix] At the UN Commission on Human Rights in 2002 and 2003, Canada was the only country to vote against resolutions recognizing the right to water.[l] Canada also played a key role in blocking a motion by Germany and Spain to officially recognize water as a human right at the UN Human Rights Council in March 2008.[li] Canada lobbied against the UN General Assembly’s resolution on the right to water in 2010, and was among the 41 countries that abstained from voting.[lii]
The federal government has offered two unconvincing rationales for its opposition. First, recognizing a human right to water would detract from other more pressing human rights by redirecting energy and resources. What could be more pressing than a situation that undermines the health and well-being of a billion people, including Canadians? Second, the human right to water could compel Canada to export water to nations where there are water shortages, including the United States. There is no legal justification for this fear, as recognition of the right to water would impose no such obligation. Canada recognizes the right to health but is not legally compelled to export doctors, nurses, or medical supplies to nations in need.
The more likely rationale is concern that Canada is failing to meet its obligation to respect, protect, and fulfill the right to water.[liii] Thousands of Canadians lack access to safe drinking water, predominantly Aboriginal people living on reserves. The federal government estimates that there are approximately 5,000 homes in First Nations communities (representing an estimated 20,000+ residents) that lack basic water and sewage services.[liv] Compared to other Canadians, First Nations’ homes are 90 times more likely to be without running water.[lv] As of 2010, 49 First Nations communities have high-risk drinking water systems and more than 100 First Nations face ongoing boil water advisories (out of roughly 600 First Nations in Canada).[lvi] The federal government admits that “The incidence of waterborne diseases is several times higher in First Nations communities than in the general population, in part because of the inadequate or non-existent water treatment systems.”[lvii] Many of these deplorable situations have been dragging on for years and in some cases decades.[lviii]
The disparity between water quality on and off reserve in Canada has been criticized by the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, and the Auditor General of Canada.[lix] In 2005, the Commissioner for Environment and Sustainable Development concluded “When it comes to the safety of drinking water, residents of First Nations communities do not benefit from a level of protection comparable with that of people living off reserves. This is partly because there are no laws and regulations governing the provision of drinking water in First Nations communities, unlike other communities.”[lx]
[i] P.H. Gleick. 1996. "Basic Water Requirements for Human Activities: Meeting Basic Needs", Water International 21: 83. G. Howard and J. Bartram. 2003.Domestic Water Quantity, Service, Level and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO and UNICEF. 2000. Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report. Geneva/New York: WHO/UNICEF. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2007. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the scope and content of the relevant human rights obligations related to equitable access to safe drinking water and sanitation under international human rights instruments. Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/6/3.
[ii] World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund. 2010. Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water: 2010 Update. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF, p. 22. UNICEF. 2006. Progress for Children: A Report Card on Water and Sanitation. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.
[iii] United Nations Development Programme. 2006. Human Development Report 2006, Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis. New York: UN, p. 60. H. Smets. 2006. The Right to Water in National Legislations. Paris: l’Agence française de Développement, p. 16.
[iv] M. Gorbachev. 2010. “The Right to Water,” New York Times, July 16, 2010. C. Dubreuil. 2006. The Right to Water: From Concept to Implementation. Marseilles: World Water Council. M. Barlow. 2007. Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. Examples of NGOs include Green Cross International, the Council of Canadians, WaterAid, Rights and Humanity, and the Freshwater Action Network. See www.righttowater.info
[v] UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. 2003. General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water. UN Doc. E/C.12/2002/11.
[vi] G. Howard and J. Bartram. 2003. Domestic Water Quantity, Service, Level and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. P.H. Gleick. 1996. "Basic Water Requirements for Human Activities: Meeting Basic Needs", Water International 21: 83.
[vii] C. de Albuquerque. 2010. The Human Right to Water and Sanitation: Frequently Asked Questions. Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Related to Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation. Geneva: Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
[viii] S.C. McCaffrey and K.J. Neville. 2009. “Small Capacity and Big Responsibilities: Financial and Legal Implication of a Human Right to Water for Developing Countries,” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 21: 678. E.B. Bluemel. 2004. “The Implications of Formulating a Human Right to Water,” Ecology Law Quarterly 31: 957.
[ix] S. Tully. 2005. “A Human Right to Access Water? A Critique of General Comment No. 15,” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 23(1): 35-63.
[x] A. Khalfan and T. Kiefer. 2008. The Human Right to Water and Sanitation: Legal Basis, Practical Rationale and Definition. Centre for Housing Rights and Evictions. Geneva: COHRE, p. 6. M. Langford. 2006. “Ambition that overleaps itself? A Response to Stephen Tully’s ‘Critique’ of the General Comment on the Right to Water,” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 26(3): 433-459. A. Hardberger. 2006. “Whose Job is it Anyway? Governmental Obligations Created by the Right to Water,” Texas International Law Journal 41: 533.
[xi] Center on Housing Rights and Evictions. 2007. Manual on the Right to Water and Sanitation. Geneva: COHRE, p. xxi.
[xii] UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. 2003. General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water. UN Doc. E/C.12/2002/11.
[xiii] UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1990. General Comment No. 3: The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations. E/1991/23.
[xiv] United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2007. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the scope and content of the relevant human rights obligations related to equitable access to safe drinking water and sanitation under international human rights instruments. Annual Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc A/HRC/6/3.
[xv] UN General Assembly. 2010. The Human Right to Water and Sanitation. July 26, 2010. A/64/L.63/Rev.1.
[xvi] I. Hunter. 2010. “Canada’s cowardly vote on the right to water,” Victoria Times-Colonist, August 1, 2010. M. Gorbachev. 2010. “The Right to Water,” New York Times, July 16, 2010. A. Khalfan and T. Kiefer. 2008. Why Canada must recognise the human right to water and sanitation. Geneva: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, p. 3. S. Howatt. 2007. “A national disgrace: Canada’s shameful position on the right to water needs to change,” Canadian Perspectives. Council of Canadians. Summer: 6-7.
[xvii] UN Human Rights Council. 2010. Human Rights and Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation. Sept. 24, 2010. A/HRC/15/L.14.
[xviii] Matsipane Mosetlhanyane et al. v. Attorney General (2011), No CACLB-074-10, 27 January 2011, Court of Appeal.
[xix] M. Langford, A. Khalfan, C. Fairstein and H. Jones, 2004. Legal Resources for the Right to Water: International and National Standards. Geneva: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.
[xx] United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2007. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the scope and content of the relevant human rights obligations related to equitable access to safe drinking water and sanitation under international human rights instruments. Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc A/HRC/6/3.
[xxi] Bolivia (Art. 16(I)) Colombia (Art. 366), the Democratic Republic of Congo (Art. 48), Dominican Republic (Arts 15 and 61), Ecuador (Art. 12), Ethiopia (Art. 90(1)), Gambia (Art. 216(4)), Kenya (Art. 43(1)(d)), the Maldives (Art. 23), Panama (Arts. 110 and 118), South Africa (Art. 27), Swaziland (Art. 215), Switzerland (Art. 76), Uganda (Arts. XIV(b) and XXI), Uruguay (Art. 47), Venezuela (Arts. 127 and 304), and Zambia (Art. 112(d)). See R. Wolfrum and R. Grote, eds. G.H. Flanz, Ed. Emeritus. 2011. Constitutions of the Countries of the World. New York: Oceana Law.
[xxii] Dominican Republic (Arts 15 and 61), Kenya (Art. 43(1)(d)).
[xxiii] R. Wolfrum and R. Grote, eds. G.H. Flanz, Ed. Emeritus. 2011. “Constitution of South Africa,” Constitutions of the Countries of the World. New York: Oceana Law, Binder XVI.
[xxiv] A. Du Plessis. 2011. “A Government in Deep Water? Some Thoughts on the State’s Duties in Relation to Water Arising from South Africa’s Bill of Rights,” RECIEL 19(3): 316. A. Kok and M. Langford. 2009. “Water,” in S. Woolman, T. Roux and M. Bishop, eds. Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd ed., Vol. 4. For example, see Water Services Act, Act No. 108 of 1997.
S. 3(1) Everyone has a right of access to basic water supply and basic sanitation.
(2) Every water services institution must take reasonable measures to realise these rights.
(3) Every water services authority must, in its water services development plan, provide for measures to realise these rights…
See also: National Water Act, Act No. 36 of 1998, Preamble, Art 4. Local Government Municipal Structures Act No. 117 of 1998. Local Government Municipal Systems Act, No. 32 of 2000.
[xxv] Promotion of Access to Information Act 2000, and Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 2000.
[xxvi] H. Smets. 2006. The Right to Water in National Legislations. Paris: Agence Française de Développement, p. 92.
[xxvii] N. Mandela. 2002. “No Water, No Future,” Speech at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 28 August 2002.
[xxviii] Courts have ordered governments to provide potable water, construct drinking water treatment facilities, treat individuals harmed by contaminated drinking water, and carry out environmental remediation. See Chacras de la Merced case www.cedha.org.ar Paynemil Mapuche Community case http://www.righttowater.org.uk/code/legal_4.asp
[xxix] Judgment No. 36/98, 1 April 1998, Belgian Court of Arbitration. http://www.arbitrage.be/public/f/1998/1998-036f.pdf
[xxx] Litigation based on the constitutional right to a healthy environment has produced a policy that all Brazilians have the right to a core minimum of environmental services including water and sanitation. See SCJ Appeal No. 575.998 (Minas Gervais). SCJ Appeal No. 70011759842 (Rio Grande do Sul), 1 December 2005. SCJ Appeal No. 70012091278 (Rio Grande do Sul), 25 Jan. 2006.
[xxxi] Sala Constitucional Nº 02154 de las 09:49 hrs. del 16 de febrero, 2007. Municipalidad de Aserrí.
[xxxii] There were over 9,000 constitutional cases brought in Colombia between 1991 and 2008 related to the provision of potable drinking water and basic sanitation. Defensoria del Pueblo (Ombudsman). 2009. Diagnostic del Cumplimiento del Derecho Humano al Agua en Colombia. For specific examples, see Constitutional Court decisions T-578 (1992), T-140 (1994), T-207 (1995), and T-410 (2003).
[xxxiii] AP Pollution Control Board v M.V. Nayudu AIR 1999 SC 812, 2001 (2) SCC 62, 2001 (9) SCC 605. See also V. Narain. 2010. “Water as a Fundamental Right: The Perspective from India,” 34 Vermont Law Review 917.
[xxxiv] Judicial Review of the Law No. 7 of 2004 on Water Resources, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Judgment of 13th July 2005, No. 058-059-060-063/PUU-II/2004.
[xxxv] N. Belbase and L.B. Thapa. 2007. “Nepal,” in P. Moore and F. Pastakia, eds. Environmental Justice and Rural Communities: Studies from India and Nepal. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp. 65-108.
[xxxvi] The Supreme Court held that “the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is a right to life itself . . . the right to have unpolluted water is the right of every person wherever he lives.” General Secretary West Pakistan Salt Miners Labour Union v. Director Industries and Mineral Development (1994) SCMR 2061 (SC).
[xxxvii] Chacras de la Merced case www.cedha.org.ar Paynemil Mapuche Community case http://www.righttowater.org.uk/code/legal_4.asp Beatriz Silvia Mendoza and others v. National Government and Others in regards to damages suffered (Damages stemming from contamination of the Matanza-Riachuelo River), 2008, M. 1569, 8 July 2008.
[xxxviii] R. Picolotti. 2005. “The Right to Safe Drinking Water as a Human Right,” Housing and ESC Rights Quarterly 2(1): 1-5.
[xxxix] R. Picolotti. 2005. “The Right to Safe Drinking Water as a Human Right,” Housing and ESC Rights Quarterly 2(1): 1-5.
[xl] Harvard Law Review. 2007. "What Price for the Priceless ? Implementing the Justiciability of the Right to Water," 120 Harv. L . Rev. 1067 at 1069. See also D. Marcus. 2006. “The Normative Development of Socioeconomic Rights Through Supranational Adjudication,” 42 Stan. J. Int’l L. 53.
[xli] D.S. Law and M. Versteeg. 2011. The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism. California Law Review (in press).
[xlii] D.R. Boyd. 2011. The Environmental Rights Revolution: Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
[xliii] D.R. Boyd. 2011. The Environmental Rights Revolution: Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
[xliv] Mazibuko et al. v. The City of Johannesburg et al. (2010) 3 BCLR 239 (Constitutional Court).
[xlv] H. Smets. 2006. The Right to Water in National Legislation. Paris: Agence Française de Développement, pp. 47-49. M. Langford, A. Khalfan, C. Fairstein and H. Jones, 2004. Legal Resources for the Right to Water: International and National Standards. Geneva: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.
[xlvi] Law No. 2006-1772, respecting water and aquatic environments, Government of France.
[xlvii] Office of the Auditor General of Canada and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. 2006. Response to Petition regarding the right of Canadians to clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment by D. Boyd. http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/esd_pet_163A_e_28897.html#response.
[xlviii] D.R. Boyd. 2003. Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy. Vancouver: UBC Press, p. 25.
[xlix] L.M. Collins. 2010. “Environmental Rights on the Wrong Side of History: Revisiting Canada’s Position on the Human Right to Water,” RECIEL 19(3): 351.
[l] M. Blanchfield. 2003. "Our painful vote against clean water," Ottawa Citizen, September 21, 2003.
[li] M. De Souza. 2008. “UN meeting rejects recognition of water as basic human right,” Ottawa Citizen, March 26, 2008. L. Diebel. 2008. “Canada foils UN water plan,” Toronto Star, April 2, 2008.
[lii] I. Hunter. 2010. “Canada’s cowardly vote on the right to water,” Victoria Times-Colonist, August 1, 2010.
[liii] D.R. Boyd. 2011. “No Taps, No Toilets: First Nations and the Constitutional Right to Water in Canada,” McGill Law Journal, in press. Available from author.
[liv] Government of Canada. 2004. Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: 4th Periodic report to the UN under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant, E/C.12/4/Add.15, p. 84.
[lv] UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. 2009. The State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. New York: United Nations, p. 25.
[lvi] Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2010. First Nations Water and Wastewater Action Plan, Progress Report April 2009-March 2010. As of September 30, 2010, there were 117 First Nations with ongoing boil water advisories. Health Canada. 2010. First Nations, Inuit, and Aboriginal Health: Drinking Water and Wastewater. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/promotion/public-publique/water-eau-eng.php
[lvii] Government of Canada. 2004. Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: 4th Periodic report to the UN under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant, E/C.12/4/Add.15, p. 84.
[lviii] Polaris Institute with the Assembly of First Nations and the Canadian Labour Congress. 2008. Boiling Point: Six Community Profiles of the Water Crisis Facing First Nations Within Canada.
[lix] UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. 2006. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant: Concluding observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Canada. UN Docs E/C.12/CAN/CO/4 and E/C.12/CAN/CO/5. at paras. 1, 15; Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. 1994. Public Policy and Aboriginal Peoples 1965-1992: Summaries of Reports, by Federal Bodies and Aboriginal Organizations, vol. 2. Hull: Canada Communication Group, pp. 226-27. Auditor General of Canada. 1995. Report of the Auditor General of Canada. Ottawa: Public Works. Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. 2005. Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
[lx] Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. 2005. Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, Chapter 5, p. 26.